Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1957-1964, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-273063

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Folate plays a critical role in nucleotide synthesis and DNA methylation, and was considered to be associated with anti-carcinogenesis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>from studies that concern the relationship between the folate intake or serum folate levels and lung cancer risk showed no consistency, which requires our further comprehensive meta-analysis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Systematic literature search was conducted to identify the relevant studies (published prior to February 2013) according to standard protocol. Estimated effects were calculated under both random-effects and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias were also evaluated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 4390 cases and 6138 controls from 6 case-control studies revealed a significant overall inverse association between folate intake and lung cancer risk (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.65 - 0.84, P < 0.001). Summary of 1438 cases and 2582 controls from 4 case-control studies and 44 cases out of a cohort of 1988 participants suggested a marginal association without significance (OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.60 - 1.02, P = 0.075) between high serum folate levels and less lung cancer susceptibility; however, subgroup analysis about population-based case-control studies showed that high serum folate levels significantly associated with the reduced lung cancer risk (OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.58 - 1.00, P = 0.048).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Higher folate intake can be a protective factor against lung cancer risk, and higher serum folate level is probably associated with reduced lung cancer risk in marginal manner, though more studies are warranted to confirm these associations.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Folic Acid , Blood , Lung Neoplasms , Blood , Epidemiology , Risk Factors
2.
Chinese Journal of Traumatology ; (6): 305-308, 2003.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-270307

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the therapeutic effect and indication between standard large trauma craniotomy and routine craniotomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>There were 97 patients in the standard large trauma craniotomy group and 110 patients in the routine craniotomy group. The mortality, postoperative ICP (intracranial pressure), ratio of pupil rebound, complication and results of six month follow-up after operation were compared between the two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Fifteen patients (15.6%) died in the standard large trauma craniotomy group and 30 (27.7%) in the routine craniotomy group. The postoperative mean ICP was 3.75 kPa+/-1.89 kPa in the standard large trauma craniotomy group and 5.11 kPa+/-1.57 kPa in the routine craniotomy group. The pupil rebound was found in 47 patients (61.0%) in the standard large trauma craniotomy group and in 41 patients (46.1%) in the routine craniotomy group (P<0.01). The rate of complication was lower in the standard large trauma craniotomy group, but no obvious difference in long-term therapeutic effect was found between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Standard large trauma craniotomy can attenuate brain hernia and the mortality of the patients with acute subdural hematoma. The incidence of complication can also be decreased. But the long term life quality of the patients can not be improved.</p>


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Acute Disease , Chi-Square Distribution , Craniotomy , Reference Standards , Follow-Up Studies , Hematoma, Subdural , Mortality , General Surgery , Intracranial Pressure , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL